Backblaze B2 vs Internxt

Detailed side-by-side comparison

Backblaze B2

Free

Backblaze B2 is an S3-compatible object storage service designed for developers and businesses seeking affordable, scalable cloud storage with predictable pricing. It offers unlimited storage capacity with generous free egress bandwidth (up to 3x daily storage amount) and built-in redundancy across multiple data centers.

Visit Backblaze B2

Internxt

Free

Internxt is a privacy-first cloud storage platform that uses zero-knowledge encryption to ensure complete file privacy and security. Built on open-source technology with GDPR-compliant EU servers, it targets individuals and businesses who prioritize data protection over extensive integrations.

Visit Internxt

Feature Comparison

Feature	Backblaze B2	Internxt
Primary Use Case	Developer-focused object storage with S3-compatible API for applications, backups, and data archiving	Personal and business file storage with emphasis on privacy and security for sensitive documents
Security & Privacy	Standard encryption in transit and at rest with data redundancy across data centers, but not zero-knowledge	Zero-knowledge end-to-end encryption with client-side encryption, ensuring only users can access their data
API & Integration	Full S3-compatible API enabling easy integration with existing tools and seamless migration from other S3 services	Limited API and third-party integrations, focused primarily on cross-platform file sync and sharing
Data Transfer Costs	Free egress bandwidth up to 3x your daily storage amount, then $0.01/GB, making it cost-effective for frequent access	No separate egress fees mentioned, bandwidth included in plan pricing with simpler cost structure
Pricing Model	Pay-as-you-go at $6/TB/month for storage with transparent per-GB pricing and no minimum commitments	Subscription plans with fixed storage limits, including unique lifetime storage options for one-time payment
Collaboration Features	Limited collaboration features, primarily designed for programmatic access and data storage rather than user collaboration	Basic file sharing capabilities but fewer collaborative features compared to mainstream providers like Google Drive

Pricing Comparison

Both offer free starter plans, but Backblaze B2 uses pay-as-you-go pricing ($6/TB/month) ideal for variable storage needs, while Internxt offers fixed subscription tiers with the unique option of lifetime plans. Backblaze B2 is generally more cost-effective for large-scale storage and applications with high data transfer needs.

Verdict

Choose Backblaze B2 if...

Choose Backblaze B2 if you're a developer or business needing affordable, scalable object storage with S3 compatibility for backups, applications, or data archiving, especially if you have high bandwidth requirements and want to avoid expensive egress fees.

Choose Internxt if...

Choose Internxt if you prioritize privacy and security above all else, need zero-knowledge encryption for sensitive personal or business files, prefer open-source transparency, or want the option of a lifetime storage plan without recurring fees.

Get Your Free Software Recommendation

Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools

1/4

What type of software are you looking for?

Select the category that best fits your needs

Cloud Storage

Pros & Cons

Backblaze B2

Pros

+ Significantly cheaper than AWS S3, Azure, and Google Cloud Storage
+ Simple, transparent pricing with no hidden fees
+ Easy migration from other S3-compatible services
+ Generous free egress bandwidth allowance

Cons

- Fewer global data center locations compared to major cloud providers
- Limited advanced features compared to AWS S3 ecosystem
- Smaller partner ecosystem and third-party integrations

Internxt

Pros

+ Strong privacy protection with client-side encryption
+ Transparent open-source architecture
+ Competitive pricing with lifetime options
+ User-friendly interface across all platforms

Cons

- Smaller ecosystem compared to major providers like Google Drive
- Limited third-party integrations
- Fewer collaborative features than mainstream alternatives