Backendless vs Make (Integromat)
Detailed side-by-side comparison
Backendless
FreeBackendless is a comprehensive visual app development platform that provides complete backend infrastructure including databases, APIs, user management, and hosting. It caters to both developers and non-developers, offering visual programming tools alongside traditional coding options to accelerate web and mobile application development.
Visit BackendlessMake (Integromat)
FreeMake (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform designed to connect apps and automate workflows through an intuitive drag-and-drop interface. With over 1,500 app integrations and advanced data transformation capabilities, it enables users to streamline repetitive tasks and build complex automation scenarios without coding.
Visit Make (Integromat)Feature Comparison
| Feature | Backendless | Make (Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Use Case | Full application development with complete backend infrastructure for building web and mobile apps from scratch | Workflow automation and app integration to connect existing tools and automate repetitive processes |
| Visual Builder | Codeless logic builder with UI components, database designer, and business logic flows for building complete applications | Drag-and-drop scenario builder for creating automation workflows with visual flow mapping and routing logic |
| Data Management | Built-in visual database designer with real-time data management, custom schemas, and direct database control | Built-in data stores for temporary workflow data and data transformation capabilities, but not a primary database solution |
| Integration Capabilities | Auto-generated RESTful and real-time APIs, webhooks, and custom API integration through pro-code options | 1,500+ pre-built app integrations plus HTTP/API modules for custom connections to any web service |
| User Management | Complete authentication and user management system with roles, permissions, and security features built-in | No native user management system; focuses on automating user-related tasks across connected applications |
| Hosting & Deployment | Includes cloud hosting with CDN, file storage, and infrastructure for deploying complete applications | Cloud-based automation execution platform; does not provide hosting for applications, only for running workflows |
Pricing Comparison
Both platforms offer generous free tiers starting at $0/month, making them accessible for testing and small projects. Backendless pricing scales based on API calls and backend resources, while Make uses operations-based pricing that can become costly for high-volume automations but offers excellent value for complex workflow scenarios.
Verdict
Choose Backendless if...
Choose Backendless if you need to build a complete web or mobile application from the ground up with full backend infrastructure, database management, user authentication, and hosting all in one platform.
Choose Make (Integromat) if...
Choose Make (Integromat) if your primary goal is to automate workflows and integrate existing applications together, streamline repetitive tasks across multiple tools, or build complex automation scenarios without developing a full application.
Get Your Free Software Recommendation
Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools
Select the category that best fits your needs
Pros & Cons
Backendless
Pros
- + Comprehensive backend services in one platform eliminates need for multiple tools
- + Both no-code and pro-code options support various skill levels
- + Generous free tier suitable for testing and small projects
- + Extensive documentation and active community support
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve compared to simpler no-code tools
- - Custom domain and advanced features require paid plans
- - Vendor lock-in can make migration to other platforms challenging
Make (Integromat)
Pros
- + More powerful and flexible than many competitors like Zapier
- + Visual scenario builder makes complex workflows easy to understand
- + Generous free tier for testing and small-scale automations
- + Excellent value for money with operations-based pricing
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve compared to simpler automation tools
- - Can become expensive for high-volume automation needs
- - Some users report occasional execution delays during peak times