Brevo vs Moosend

Detailed side-by-side comparison

Brevo

Brevo

Free

Brevo (formerly Sendinblue) is a comprehensive marketing platform that extends beyond email to include SMS, chat, CRM, and Facebook Ads integration. It stands out with its unique pay-as-you-go pricing model based on email volume rather than contact list size, making it ideal for businesses with large contact databases.

Visit Brevo
Moosend

Moosend

Free

Moosend is an affordable, user-friendly email marketing and automation platform focused on delivering core email marketing capabilities with robust automation workflows. It's designed for businesses of all sizes seeking an intuitive interface with powerful automation features at competitive pricing, though with fewer multichannel options than some competitors.

Visit Moosend

Feature Comparison

FeatureBrevoMoosend
Email Marketing & AutomationIncludes email marketing with automation workflows, though the drag-and-drop builder can occasionally be glitchy. Offers transactional email capabilities as well.Features an intuitive drag-and-drop editor with responsive templates and robust automation workflows with triggers available at all pricing levels.
Multi-Channel MarketingComprehensive multi-channel approach including SMS marketing, live chat, Facebook Ads integration, and transactional email all in one platform.Primarily focused on email marketing with landing page builder included, but lacks SMS, chat, or social media advertising features.
CRM & Contact ManagementBuilt-in CRM functionality with unlimited contact storage - you only pay based on the number of emails sent, not contacts stored.Advanced list segmentation and personalization capabilities, but no dedicated CRM component. Pricing may be based on contact list size.
Landing Pages & FormsIncludes landing page builder and customizable signup forms to capture leads directly within the platform.Offers a landing page builder with real-time analytics to create conversion-focused pages alongside email campaigns.
Analytics & TestingProvides standard email analytics and reporting capabilities across all marketing channels in the platform.Real-time analytics and reporting with A/B testing capabilities for optimizing campaign performance.
Integrations & SupportWide range of integrations but support can sometimes be slow. Features strict account validation process which may delay onboarding.Limited third-party integrations compared to competitors, but compensates with excellent customer support and onboarding experience.

Pricing Comparison

Both platforms offer generous free tiers starting at $0/month. Brevo's unique advantage is unlimited contact storage with pay-per-email-sent pricing, while Moosend offers highly competitive pricing with robust automation at all levels, making both excellent value options for budget-conscious businesses.

Verdict

Choose Brevo if...

Choose Brevo if you need a multi-channel marketing platform with SMS, chat, and CRM capabilities, or if you have a large contact list but send emails infrequently, as you'll benefit from unlimited contact storage and pay-as-you-go email pricing.

Choose Moosend if...

Choose Moosend if you're primarily focused on email marketing automation and want a user-friendly platform with excellent support and straightforward pricing, especially if you're a beginner or don't require SMS or multi-channel marketing features.

Get Your Free Software Recommendation

Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools

1/4

Select the category that best fits your needs

Email Marketing

Pros & Cons

Brevo

Pros

  • + Unlimited contacts (pay by volume)
  • + SMS marketing included
  • + Great free tier

Cons

  • - Drag-and-drop builder can be glitchy
  • - Support is sometimes slow
  • - Strict account validation

Moosend

Pros

  • + Highly competitive pricing with generous free tier
  • + User-friendly interface suitable for beginners
  • + Robust automation capabilities at all pricing levels
  • + Excellent customer support and onboarding

Cons

  • - Limited third-party integrations compared to competitors
  • - Template library could be more extensive
  • - Some advanced features require learning curve