Carbonite vs Wasabi
Detailed side-by-side comparison
Carbonite
From $6/moCarbonite is an automated cloud backup solution designed for both businesses and individuals who need continuous data protection without worrying about storage limits. It focuses on simplicity with set-it-and-forget-it backup functionality, offering unlimited storage and multiple recovery methods including physical courier delivery.
Visit CarboniteWasabi
From $6.99/moWasabi is an enterprise-focused cloud object storage service that competes directly with AWS S3, Azure, and Google Cloud Storage by offering S3-compatible storage at significantly lower costs. It eliminates egress fees and provides predictable pricing, making it ideal for businesses with large-scale storage needs and technical teams comfortable with object storage systems.
Visit WasabiFeature Comparison
| Feature | Carbonite | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Storage Type & Use Case | Traditional backup service with automatic file/folder protection for endpoints and servers, designed for non-technical users | Object storage service requiring S3-compatible applications or APIs, designed for developers and IT teams managing application data |
| Storage Limits & Pricing Model | Unlimited cloud storage on most plans with flat monthly fee per device or user | Pay-per-GB pricing ($6.99/TB/month) with no egress fees, but minimum 90-day storage commitment per object |
| Data Recovery Options | Multiple options including web interface, remote file access, and physical courier recovery service for large restores | API-based retrieval with no egress fees; requires technical implementation through S3-compatible tools |
| Backup Automation | Automatic continuous backup that monitors and backs up changed files in real-time without user intervention | No built-in backup automation; requires integration with third-party backup software or custom scripting |
| Security & Compliance | Military-grade encryption for data in transit and at rest, focused on general business security needs | 11 nines of durability (99.999999999%), immutable storage buckets for compliance, built-in ransomware protection features |
| Integration & Compatibility | Standalone solution with native applications for Windows and Mac, external hard drive backup support | S3-compatible API enables easy migration from AWS and integration with hundreds of backup and storage applications |
Pricing Comparison
Carbonite offers unlimited storage starting at $6/month per device, making it cost-effective for individual users or small teams with unpredictable storage needs. Wasabi starts at $6.99 per TB per month with no egress fees, making it dramatically cheaper for organizations storing multiple terabytes but requiring technical expertise to implement.
Verdict
Choose Carbonite if...
Choose Carbonite if you need a simple, automated backup solution for individual computers or small business endpoints, want unlimited storage without technical complexity, or need user-friendly recovery options including physical courier delivery.
Choose Wasabi if...
Choose Wasabi if you're managing large-scale enterprise storage (multiple terabytes), have technical resources to work with S3-compatible APIs, need predictable costs without egress fees, or want to migrate from expensive AWS S3 storage while maintaining compatibility.
Get Your Free Software Recommendation
Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools
Select the category that best fits your needs
Pros & Cons
Carbonite
Pros
- + Unlimited storage on most plans
- + Easy setup and automatic operation
- + Strong encryption and security features
- + Multiple recovery options including courier delivery
Cons
- - Can be slow for initial backup of large data sets
- - Limited version history compared to competitors
- - Higher pricing compared to some alternatives
Wasabi
Pros
- + Significantly cheaper than AWS S3, Azure, and Google Cloud Storage
- + Predictable pricing with no hidden egress or API fees
- + Fast performance with low latency access
- + Simple pricing structure that's easy to understand
Cons
- - Minimum 90-day storage commitment per object
- - Smaller global infrastructure compared to major cloud providers
- - Limited integration ecosystem compared to AWS