Fillout vs SurveyMonkey
Detailed side-by-side comparison
Fillout
FreeFillout is a modern no-code form builder focused on creating sophisticated forms, surveys, and quizzes with advanced logic and native integrations. It offers unlimited forms and responses even on its free tier, making it ideal for businesses that need powerful form capabilities without complexity.
Visit FilloutSurveyMonkey
FreeSurveyMonkey is an established survey platform with over 20 years in the market, trusted by millions for professional data collection and analysis. It provides extensive templates, robust analytics, and AI-powered insights, making it a go-to solution for market research, customer feedback, and employee engagement surveys.
Visit SurveyMonkeyFeature Comparison
| Feature | Fillout | SurveyMonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Form/Survey Builder | Drag-and-drop interface with advanced question types including file uploads and scheduling capabilities | Drag-and-drop builder with 200+ expert templates and extensive question bank for quick survey creation |
| Logic and Branching | Conditional logic and branching available on all plans including free tier | Skip logic and branching available only on paid plans, not included in free version |
| Integrations | Native integrations with Airtable, Notion, and Google Sheets without requiring third-party tools | Integration with 100+ apps including Salesforce, Microsoft Teams, and Slack through various connection methods |
| Analytics and Reporting | Form analytics and completion tracking with limited advanced reporting on lower tiers | Real-time analytics with customizable dashboards, AI-powered sentiment analysis, and multiple data export formats |
| Free Plan Limitations | Unlimited forms and unlimited responses with access to core features | Limited to 10 questions per survey and 40 responses total, restricting usability for most projects |
| Payment Collection | Built-in Stripe integration for accepting payments directly through forms | No native payment collection feature; requires third-party integrations |
Pricing Comparison
Both tools offer free plans, but Fillout provides significantly more value with unlimited forms and responses, while SurveyMonkey's free tier is restricted to 10 questions and 40 responses. SurveyMonkey's paid plans can be more expensive for small businesses, especially when advanced features are needed, whereas Fillout offers a more generous feature set at lower price points.
Verdict
Choose Fillout if...
Choose Fillout if you need unlimited responses on a budget, want native integrations with tools like Airtable and Notion, require payment collection through forms, or prefer having advanced features like conditional logic available on the free tier.
Choose SurveyMonkey if...
Choose SurveyMonkey if you need extensive survey templates and question banks for professional research, require sophisticated analytics with AI-powered insights, want a proven platform with strong brand recognition, or need comprehensive reporting capabilities for complex data analysis.
Get Your Free Software Recommendation
Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools
Select the category that best fits your needs
Pros & Cons
Fillout
Pros
- + Intuitive drag-and-drop interface that's easy to learn
- + Generous free tier with unlimited forms and responses
- + Excellent native integrations without requiring Zapier
- + Modern, clean UI with great mobile responsiveness
Cons
- - Fewer third-party integrations compared to Typeform or Jotform
- - Limited advanced reporting features on lower tiers
- - Relatively newer platform with smaller community
SurveyMonkey
Pros
- + Intuitive interface that's easy for beginners to use
- + Extensive template library and question bank saves time
- + Robust analytics with data export options in multiple formats
- + Strong brand reputation and reliability with 20+ years in market
Cons
- - Free plan limited to 10 questions and 40 responses per survey
- - Advanced features like skip logic require paid plans
- - Pricing can be expensive for small businesses compared to alternatives