Make (Integromat) vs n8n
Detailed side-by-side comparison
Make (Integromat)
FreeMake (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform that connects over 1,500 apps through an intuitive drag-and-drop interface, enabling users to automate workflows without coding. It's known for its powerful data transformation capabilities and visual scenario builder that makes even complex automations easy to understand and manage.
Visit Make (Integromat)n8n
Freen8n is a fair-code workflow automation platform that stands out for its self-hosting capabilities, giving users complete control over their data and automation infrastructure. With 400+ integrations and the ability to execute custom code, it appeals to users who prioritize privacy, transparency, and unlimited execution potential on self-hosted instances.
Visit n8nFeature Comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| App Integrations | 1,500+ native integrations including all major platforms like Google, Slack, Salesforce, and Microsoft | 400+ pre-built integrations with API connections, fewer out-of-the-box options but extensible through custom code |
| Deployment Options | Cloud-only platform with no self-hosting option, all workflows run on Make's infrastructure | Choice between cloud-hosted or self-hosted deployment, giving complete control over data and infrastructure |
| Execution Limits | Operations-based pricing model with limits based on subscription tier, charges per operation executed | No execution limits on self-hosted instances; cloud version has execution-based pricing tiers |
| Custom Code Execution | Supports custom functions and data manipulation within the platform's visual interface | Full JavaScript and Python code execution support for maximum flexibility and custom logic |
| Data Control & Privacy | Data processed through Make's cloud servers with standard security measures and compliance certifications | Self-hosting option allows complete data sovereignty with workflows running on your own infrastructure |
| Source Code Access | Proprietary closed-source platform with no access to underlying code | Fair-code model with source code available for inspection, customization, and transparency |
Pricing Comparison
Both platforms offer free tiers to get started, but their value propositions differ significantly. Make charges per operation executed with competitive cloud pricing, while n8n offers unlimited executions on self-hosted instances (free except for infrastructure costs) or cloud pricing that can scale with usage.
Verdict
Choose Make (Integromat) if...
Choose Make if you want a cloud-based solution with the largest selection of pre-built integrations (1,500+) and prefer a polished platform without managing infrastructure. It's ideal for businesses that prioritize ease of use and comprehensive app coverage over data sovereignty.
Choose n8n if...
Choose n8n if you need complete control over your data through self-hosting, want unlimited executions without per-operation costs, or require source code access for customization and transparency. It's perfect for technical teams, privacy-conscious organizations, or those with high-volume automation needs.
Get Your Free Software Recommendation
Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools
Select the category that best fits your needs
Pros & Cons
Make (Integromat)
Pros
- + More powerful and flexible than many competitors like Zapier
- + Visual scenario builder makes complex workflows easy to understand
- + Generous free tier for testing and small-scale automations
- + Excellent value for money with operations-based pricing
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve compared to simpler automation tools
- - Can become expensive for high-volume automation needs
- - Some users report occasional execution delays during peak times
n8n
Pros
- + Self-hostable for enhanced privacy and control
- + Source code available for customization and transparency
- + No execution limits on self-hosted instances
- + Advanced features like error handling and branching included
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve compared to simpler automation tools
- - Self-hosting requires technical knowledge and infrastructure
- - Cloud version can become expensive at scale