Make (Integromat) vs Thunkable
Detailed side-by-side comparison
Make (Integromat)
FreeMake (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform that connects over 1,500 apps to automate workflows and repetitive tasks without coding. It excels at building complex integrations with advanced data transformation, routing capabilities, and real-time monitoring through an intuitive drag-and-drop interface.
Visit Make (Integromat)Thunkable
FreeThunkable is a no-code mobile app development platform that enables users to build native iOS and Android applications using drag-and-drop tools. It's designed for entrepreneurs and businesses who want to create cross-platform mobile apps without writing code, featuring pre-built components and real-time device testing.
Visit ThunkableFeature Comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | Thunkable |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Use Case | Workflow automation and app integration for connecting existing software tools and automating business processes | Mobile app development for creating standalone native iOS and Android applications from scratch |
| Visual Builder | Scenario builder with flowchart-style automation paths, data routers, and conditional logic for workflow orchestration | Mobile UI designer with drag-and-drop components for screens, navigation, and app interface design |
| Integration Capabilities | 1,500+ pre-built app connectors plus HTTP/API modules for custom integrations and webhooks for real-time triggers | API integration and database connectivity for connecting external data sources to mobile apps |
| Testing & Deployment | Real-time execution monitoring, error handling, and debugging tools for automation scenarios | Live testing on actual iOS and Android devices through mobile app, with one-click publishing to app stores |
| Output/Deliverable | Automated workflows running in the background connecting various apps and services | Standalone native mobile applications published to Apple App Store and Google Play Store |
| Learning Curve | Moderate to steep learning curve due to advanced features like data transformation and complex routing logic | Beginner-friendly for basic apps but requires understanding of mobile UX design and app architecture for quality results |
Pricing Comparison
Both tools offer free starter plans, making them accessible for testing and small projects. Make uses operations-based pricing which can scale with usage, while Thunkable's pricing increases significantly for team collaboration and commercial app publishing.
Verdict
Choose Make (Integromat) if...
Choose Make if you need to automate workflows, connect multiple SaaS tools, sync data between platforms, or eliminate repetitive tasks across your existing software ecosystem. It's ideal for business process automation and integration projects.
Choose Thunkable if...
Choose Thunkable if you want to build and publish native mobile applications for iOS and Android without coding. It's perfect for entrepreneurs, startups, and businesses looking to create customer-facing mobile apps or internal tools.
Get Your Free Software Recommendation
Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools
Select the category that best fits your needs
Pros & Cons
Make (Integromat)
Pros
- + More powerful and flexible than many competitors like Zapier
- + Visual scenario builder makes complex workflows easy to understand
- + Generous free tier for testing and small-scale automations
- + Excellent value for money with operations-based pricing
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve compared to simpler automation tools
- - Can become expensive for high-volume automation needs
- - Some users report occasional execution delays during peak times
Thunkable
Pros
- + True native app development without coding knowledge required
- + Real-time testing on actual devices through mobile app
- + Active community and extensive documentation
- + Responsive design tools for multiple screen sizes
Cons
- - Limited customization compared to traditional coding
- - Can become expensive for teams and commercial projects
- - Performance limitations for complex applications