Remote.com vs Rippling

Detailed side-by-side comparison

Remote.com

From $29/mo

Remote.com is a specialized global HR platform focused on international hiring, offering Employer of Record (EOR) services across 170+ countries. It enables companies to hire and pay employees and contractors worldwide without establishing legal entities, with strong emphasis on compliance and global payroll processing.

Visit Remote.com

Rippling

From $8/mo

Rippling is a comprehensive workforce management platform that unifies HR, IT, and Finance operations into a single system. It goes beyond payroll and benefits to include device management, app provisioning, and custom workflow automation, making it ideal for businesses seeking an all-in-one solution.

Visit Rippling

Feature Comparison

Feature	Remote.com	Rippling
Global Coverage	Supports 170+ countries with EOR services and processes payroll in 100+ currencies	Offers global payroll in 90+ countries with less emphasis on EOR services
IT Management	No IT or device management capabilities; focused purely on HR and payroll	Includes comprehensive IT features like device management (MDM) and app provisioning for employee hardware and software
Contractor Management	Dedicated contractor management and payment system alongside employee payroll	Supports contractor payments but primarily designed for full-time employee management
Automation & Workflows	Automated tax compliance and reporting with standard HR workflows	Advanced custom workflow automation across HR, IT, and Finance with 500+ app integrations
Employer of Record	Core offering with robust EOR services for compliant international hiring without local entities	Offers global employment capabilities but EOR is not the primary focus
Platform Scope	Specialized platform focused on global employment, payroll, benefits, and equity management	All-in-one platform covering HR, payroll, benefits, IT infrastructure, and finance operations

Pricing Comparison

Rippling starts at $8/month compared to Remote.com's $29/month, making it appear more affordable initially, though both can become expensive depending on specific needs and employee count. Remote.com's higher base price reflects its specialized EOR services, while Rippling's broader feature set may require add-ons that increase total cost.

Verdict

Choose Remote.com if...

Choose Remote.com if you're primarily focused on international expansion and need robust Employer of Record services to hire employees in multiple countries without establishing legal entities. It's ideal for companies with distributed global teams who need specialized compliance support and contractor management.

Choose Rippling if...

Choose Rippling if you want a unified platform that consolidates HR, payroll, IT, and finance operations into one system with powerful automation capabilities. It's best for growing businesses that need to manage not just people but also devices, apps, and complex workflows across their entire organization.

Get Your Free Software Recommendation

Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools

1/4

What type of software are you looking for?

Select the category that best fits your needs

HR & Recruiting

Pros & Cons

Remote.com

Pros

+ Simplifies international hiring without establishing legal entities
+ Comprehensive compliance support across multiple jurisdictions
+ Unified platform for employees and contractors worldwide
+ Competitive pricing compared to traditional EOR providers

Cons

- Premium pricing may not suit small businesses or startups
- Limited customization options for complex payroll scenarios
- Some countries have longer onboarding times than others

Rippling

Pros

+ Comprehensive platform that eliminates the need for multiple point solutions
+ Powerful automation capabilities that save significant administrative time
+ Strong integrations with 500+ business applications
+ Excellent for managing remote and international teams

Cons

- Can be expensive for small businesses with limited needs
- Steep learning curve due to extensive feature set
- Some users report customer support response times could be faster