Sync.com vs Wasabi

Detailed side-by-side comparison

Sync.com

Free

Sync.com is a zero-knowledge encrypted cloud storage service focused on privacy and security for individuals and businesses. It provides secure file storage, sharing, and collaboration with end-to-end encryption that ensures only you can access your data, making it ideal for users who prioritize privacy above all else.

Visit Sync.com

Wasabi

From $6.99/mo

Wasabi is a high-performance, low-cost cloud object storage service designed for businesses requiring affordable, S3-compatible storage without egress fees. It offers enterprise-grade security and reliability at significantly lower costs than traditional cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.

Visit Wasabi

Feature Comparison

Feature	Sync.com	Wasabi
Primary Use Case	Personal and business file storage with sync, share, and collaboration features for end-users	Enterprise object storage for developers and businesses needing S3-compatible infrastructure for applications and backups
Security & Encryption	Zero-knowledge end-to-end encryption with client-side encryption, ensuring provider cannot access your data; includes 2FA and ransomware rollback	Enterprise-grade security with immutable storage buckets and built-in ransomware protection, but uses standard server-side encryption (not zero-knowledge)
Data Access & Integration	User-friendly apps for desktop and mobile with automatic syncing; limited third-party integrations	S3-compatible API enabling seamless integration with thousands of applications and easy migration from AWS S3
Pricing Model	Free tier available (5GB), then per-user monthly subscription pricing for increased storage and features	Pay-as-you-go based on storage usage ($6.99/TB/month) with no egress fees, but minimum 90-day storage commitment per object
Collaboration Features	Real-time collaboration, file versioning, secure sharing with password protection and expiration dates	No built-in collaboration features; designed as infrastructure storage for applications rather than team collaboration
Compliance & Durability	GDPR and HIPAA compliant with focus on privacy compliance	11 nines of object durability (99.999999999%) with immutable storage for compliance requirements and multi-region replication

Pricing Comparison

Sync.com offers a free tier and user-based subscriptions starting at $0/month, making it accessible for individuals and small teams. Wasabi starts at $6.99/TB/month with predictable pay-as-you-go pricing and no egress fees, which can be significantly more cost-effective for businesses storing large amounts of data.

Verdict

Choose Sync.com if...

Choose Sync.com if you're an individual or team needing user-friendly cloud storage with maximum privacy protection, file syncing across devices, and collaboration features. It's ideal for those who prioritize zero-knowledge encryption and want a Dropbox-like experience with superior security.

Choose Wasabi if...

Choose Wasabi if you're a business or developer needing affordable, high-performance object storage for applications, backups, or archives with S3 compatibility. It's perfect for organizations managing large datasets who want to reduce cloud storage costs without sacrificing reliability or performance.

Get Your Free Software Recommendation

Answer a few quick questions and we'll match you with the perfect tools

1/4

What type of software are you looking for?

Select the category that best fits your needs

Cloud Storage

Pros & Cons

Sync.com

Pros

+ Industry-leading privacy with zero-knowledge encryption
+ Generous free storage tier (5GB)
+ Excellent security features including 2FA and ransomware rollback
+ Intuitive interface with robust sharing controls

Cons

- Slower sync speeds compared to some competitors
- Limited third-party app integrations
- No native Linux desktop client

Wasabi

Pros

+ Significantly cheaper than AWS S3, Azure, and Google Cloud Storage
+ Predictable pricing with no hidden egress or API fees
+ Fast performance with low latency access
+ Simple pricing structure that's easy to understand

Cons

- Minimum 90-day storage commitment per object
- Smaller global infrastructure compared to major cloud providers
- Limited integration ecosystem compared to AWS